This was the first time shooting long range, and that could be easily seen in my pictures. If I were given a chance to shoot, I would change so many different things about my shots. I would definitely focus on composition a lot more. I think I totally neglected that today, and that was stupid of me.
As I'm reading Art and Fear and doing this project, I'm finding myself relating to it even more. The authors speak about materials, and how they have potential. They do what your hands make them do. Having this super expensive camera with a super expensive lens was thrilling. They were seducing me with their potential. Having a higher quality camera makes a difference in the photos you shoot, but not entirely. The quality of the photo may be superb, but the shot itself may not be that all impressive. I can relate to that for sure.
Going back to shooting without seeing the pictures right after, this was the uncertainty I was faced with. I had no idea if my pictures would come out with a perfect exposure. "Photographer Jerry Uelsmann once gave a slide lecture in which he showed every single image he had created in the span of one year: some hundred-odd pieces- all but about ten of which he judged insufficient and destroyed without ever exhibiting." I took 112 pictures today, and I liked MAYBE four or five pictures. Uncertainty is inevitably, and makes working a bit more interesting.
PS: I think this book is one of the greatest, and reading it has helped me understand myself and art a lot better.
"I took 112 pictures today, and I liked MAYBE four or five pictures."
ReplyDeleteHmmm... that's about 5%, a little less, 3.5% or something. That's about average. I shoot 300 shots in a headshot session.... but only one of them becomes the headshot. 1% of my pictures actually get seen. Really, who cares how many of them are good? My reputation rests on 1% of what I shoot. One friggin' percent!
You make a lot of good points in this post, and in all your posts. It is a pleasure to be an artist in your community.
Warm regards,
Luke